Monday, 9 May 2011

THINK!

I don't know why I bother to argue/discuss things with the women at work as often as I do, which isn't very often. Most of the time, when someone (especially Two Clowns) says something stupid or which I know to be an historical or factual inaccuracy, I just sigh to myself and whisper the mantra, "Let it go."

But occasionally I think, "Here's an opportunity to educate someone!" And this almost always leads to disappointment for me.

Like the second time Princess Anne ventured to talk about the "Paki dot." This is an expression I find really offensive, smacking as it does of racism and ignorance.

But people get defensive and pissy when you attack them the way you might initially be inclined, so when she said "Paki dot," most recently, I turned to her and said as neutrally as I could manage, "Do you know what the 'Paki dot' is?"

"No," she said, to no-one's surprise.

"It's properly called a bhindi," I explained. "It is an ancient and sacred symbol of a woman's marriage to her husbnad, which in Hindu tradition, is not just for this lifetime, but for all reincarnations. It is a time-homoured symbol of a woman's maturity and represents that she is able to take her place in society with the rest of the adult females."

And I said all this because I think it is not enough to simply condemn racism and ignorance; it is necessary also to educate.

But Princess Anne wasn't impressed. She doesn't say "Paki dot" anymore, but that's because I obviously find it offensive, and not because my words had any effect on her. Alas. I can't say I didn't try.

Then on the morning of the Royal Wedding between Prince William and Kate Middleton, a discussion broke out regarding who will be the next Queen of England. The Cub thought it would be Kate Middleton, obviously confusing a wedding with a coronation.

"The next Queen of England, will be Prince Charles's wife," I said.

"No, it won't" said a woman so despised in the office that she is referred to variously as Fucking Bitch, Cunt or Hitler, depending on who you talk to (and no, it's not Teeth). "Camilla won't be Queen because she's been divorced once before."

"So has Charles," I said. "Diana didn't die while married to him. You think they'll deny him the throne because he divorced?"

"Oh, no, he'll be King, but they won't let her become Queen," said the Villified One.

This is just bullshit and I started to get a little impatient. "According to the Ascension Act of 1759, the Heir Apparent's wife must become the Queen when the Sovereign dies. It would require the changing of the British Constitution--which is not likely--to wrangle the scenario you are suggesting."

Now, I confess, I made the year of the Ascension Act up out of the thin air because at that moment, I couldn't recall the precise year. But I do know, from my various readings on the Queen and her lot that I am right. And it effectively shut the WalMart girls up, but only because I outgeeked them. It has become rampantly and abundantly clear to me that people like the sound of their own voices (hence blogs like this one) and will happily blather on stupidly regarding topics they know nothing about.

For example:

Last Thursday in the lunch room, Yvette and Two Clowns--for reasons I can no longer recall--were discussing post-mortem disposition. Or, what happens to you after you die. This might have come up as a result of me saying I can't bear to think about being cremated (weird, I know, but I can't).

"You know," said Two Clowns, "your hair and fingernails continue to grow for three months after you die."

"I heard four," said Yvette.

"Actually," I said, "this is deceptive. It's not that the fingernails and hair are growing. What is actually happening is that the extremities--your nose, toes, fingers and scalp--are dessicating, thus giving the illusion of growth. But really, you're shrinking."

"That's not correct," said Two Clowns bluntly, and gave me this superior, condescending smile that immediately make me want to kick her in the chin.

"If you do some rudimentary research," I replied reasonably, "I think you will find it is, in fact, true. I've done a certain amount of research on this subject."

But the dead silence in the room suggested that neither Two Clowns--supposedly a woman of accomplishment and education--nor Yvette believed a word I said. I dunno; maybe it's more fun to think of your hair and nails growing in the casket even though it's not physically possible BECAUSE YOU'VE STOPPED METABOLIZING, and this would become obvious the second you applied any kind of logical thought to the matter.

But it's becoming increasingly obvious to me that they just see me as some kind of geek possessed of a vast wealth of esoteric and/or useless knowledge. And they're right. Most of what I appear to know isn't exactly practical knowledge. I just don't understand how or why they choose to live in ignorance.

People: I just don't get 'em.

7 comments:

Taryn said...

The question is did the silence come about because they thought you were wrong or because you had done research on the situation? I personally would be more fearful that your research included many ways to dispose of a recently deceased body... but then again, I tend to be smarter than the average bear... teehee...

Liz said...

OMG, Taryn--in this office, you would shrivel up and die. I swear.

Or maybe they think that "doing s certain amount of research on the subject" means in their minds that I sit around watching bpdies decompose for yuks.

Philippe de St-Denis said...

Whoops. I meant that comment to be mine.

My bad.

Keith said...

They LIKE to live in ignorance, laced with the thought that they've got a good enough handle on what's going on. Actually doing the research and thinking in an organized way about something is still fairly difficult, even in the age of The Google.

For instance. The 9-11 conspiracy nuts think anything but the planes crashing into the buildings brought them down. They impute massive competence to the US intelligence agencies, and a huge shadowy conspiracy involving what seems to be the entire US government, including George Bush.

I know this is incorrect, because in all of human history there aren't any exceptions to the rule "The only way 3 people can keep a secret is if 2 of them are dead." The possibility of someone spilling the beans before or after goes up exponentially as the number of people in on the secret increase, and as the importance of the secret increases. If it had been done that way, someone would have leaked it.

But that implies terrible things about your fellow humans. That they can't be trusted. That stupid shit really happens to good people, utterly by random chance. That sometimes the explanation really is simple and obvious, and unflattering to the people involved.

The ignorant dumbasses of the world would rather believe easy stupid shit, than somewhat more difficult uncomfortable truths.

But that doesn't mean I don't think they should vote, far from it. But what we do is mark their ballot with a special sign, and assume that if they are voting FOR a particular candidate, they really ought NOT to win, and so their ballot should be SUBTRACTED from that candidates vote total.

Philippe de St-Denis said...

It's too bad you're already married, cuz I would snap you up. You and Jon Stewart and Rick Mercer.

*sigh*

batgirl said...

As my husband occasionally says, 'You can't argue someone out of a position they weren't argued into.'
They don't want to be correct, they just want to be right.

Didn't Robert Heinlein suggest that anyone should be able to vote provided they could solve a simple quadratic equation?

Maven said...

Re: Keith
While I'm not a full on addle-minded conspiracy theorist, I do think there is a LOT that went on on 9/11, a lot we do not know, a lot we may never know. But my bet's on operatives working with/within/without the US government could have been involved.